To choose the right safety gloves, start by identifying the specific hazard — mechanical, chemical, thermal, electrical, or biological — then match the glove material, thickness, and certification rating to that hazard. There is no universal safety glove: a glove that excels against cuts may offer zero chemical resistance, and a chemically resistant glove may provide no grip or thermal protection. Choosing incorrectly can be as dangerous as wearing no gloves at all, since it creates a false sense of security.
Content
Every glove selection decision begins with a formal or informal hazard assessment. The main hazard categories that safety gloves address are:
Many jobs involve multiple hazard types simultaneously. In these cases, the glove must address the dominant or highest-consequence hazard first, then be evaluated for secondary hazard performance.
Cut resistance is the most commonly misunderstood glove rating. Two international standards dominate the industry: EN 388 (Europe) and ANSI/ISEA 105 (North America). They use different test methods and rating scales, so a glove rated under one standard cannot be directly compared to a glove rated under the other.
| Standard | Cut Level Scale | Test Method | Typical Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| EN 388 | A–F (lowest to highest) | TDM-100 blade test | European industrial workplaces |
| ANSI/ISEA 105 | A1–A9 (lowest to highest) | ASTM F2992 (TDM-100) | North American industrial workplaces |
As a practical guide: ANSI A4–A6 or EN 388 Level C–D covers most general manufacturing and construction applications. Glass handling and metal stamping typically require ANSI A7–A9 or EN 388 Level E–F.
Chemical-resistant gloves must be matched to the specific chemical in use. No single glove material resists all chemicals, and cross-referencing a glove manufacturer's chemical compatibility chart is mandatory before use. Below is a general guide to common materials:
| Glove Material | Strong Against | Weak Against | Typical Thickness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrile | Oils, fuels, many acids | Ketones, strong oxidizers | 0.1–0.4 mm |
| Neoprene | Acids, alcohols, refrigerants | Aromatic hydrocarbons | 0.4–1.0 mm |
| Butyl Rubber | Ketones, esters, strong acids | Aliphatic/aromatic solvents | 0.7–1.5 mm |
| Natural Latex | Dilute acids, biological fluids | Oils, solvents, latex allergies | 0.1–0.3 mm |
| PVC | Acids, alkalis, water-based chemicals | Solvents, aromatic compounds | 0.5–2.0 mm |
For unknown chemical mixtures or high-risk environments, laminated multi-layer gloves (combining materials like Viton, butyl, and neoprene) provide broader spectrum protection, though at the cost of reduced dexterity.
Heat-resistant gloves are rated under EN 407 in Europe, which assigns a 6-digit performance code covering resistance to burning, contact heat, convective heat, radiant heat, molten metal small splashes, and molten metal large splashes. For general welding, a glove rated at contact heat level 3 (200°C) or higher is the minimum acceptable standard. Foundry work with molten metal splash requires level 4 (250°C) or above.
Common heat-resistant glove materials include split leather, aluminized fabric (for radiant heat reflection up to 1,000°C), and aramid fiber (e.g., Kevlar-type materials) for cut-plus-heat combinations.
Cold-protection gloves are rated under EN 511, which tests convective cold resistance, contact cold resistance, and water penetration. For cold storage work at temperatures above -18°C, insulated lined gloves typically suffice. For cryogenic work involving liquid nitrogen (-196°C) or dry ice (-78.5°C), cryogenic gauntlet gloves with a loose fit (to allow rapid removal if liquid enters the glove) are required.
Electrical insulating gloves are a critical life-safety item and are strictly regulated under IEC 60903 / ASTM D120. They are classified by maximum use voltage and must be regularly tested and retested — typically every 6 months — to maintain certification.
Electrical insulating gloves must always be worn with a leather over-glove to protect the rubber from puncture and abrasion. The rubber glove provides insulation; the leather glove prevents physical damage to the rubber.
A glove that workers refuse to wear because it is uncomfortable provides no protection at all. Compliance rates drop significantly when gloves impair dexterity or cause hand fatigue, and studies have shown that ill-fitting gloves can actually increase injury risk by causing workers to compensate with awkward grip postures.
The choice between disposable and reusable gloves depends on contamination risk, task duration, and total cost of ownership.
Even experienced safety managers make these selection errors:
If you are interested in our products, please consult us